Randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis of oral decontamination with 2% chlorhexidine solution for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
نویسندگان
چکیده
OBJECTIVE To determine the effectiveness of oral decontamination with 2% chlorhexidine solution for the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). DESIGN Randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis. SETTING A tertiary care university hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. PARTICIPANTS Adult patients who received mechanical ventilation and who were hospitalized in intensive care units and general medical wards. METHODS The patients were randomized to receive oral decontamination with 2% chlorhexidine solution or normal saline solution 4 times per day until their endotracheal tubes were removed. The outcome measures were the development of VAP and oropharyngeal colonization with gram-negative bacilli. Meta-analysis was performed by combining the results of the present study with those from another randomized controlled trial that also used a 2% chlorhexidine formulation for oral decontamination. RESULTS The characteristics of the patients in the chlorhexidine group (n=102) and the normal saline group (n=105) were not significantly different. The incidence of VAP in the chlorhexidine group was 4.9% (5 of 102), and the incidence in the normal saline group was 11.4% (12 of 105) (P=.08). The rate of VAP in the chlorhexidine group was 7 episodes per 1,000 ventilator-days, and the rate in the normal saline group was 21 episodes per 1,000 ventilator-days (P=.04). Irritation of the oral mucosa was observed in 10 (9.8%) of the patients in the chlorhexidine group and in 1 (0.9%) of the patients in the normal saline group (P=.001). Oropharyngeal colonization with gram-negative bacilli was either reduced or delayed in the chlorhexidine group. Overall mortality of the patients did not differ significantly between the groups. Meta-analysis of 2 randomized controlled trials revealed an overall relative risk of VAP for patients in the chlorhexidine group of 0.53 (95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.90; P=.02). CONCLUSION Oral decontamination with 2% chlorhexidine solution is an effective and safe method for preventing VAP in patients who receive mechanical ventilation.
منابع مشابه
Resolving conflicts with surrogate decision makers.
1 . Panchabhai TS , Dangayach NS , Krishnan A , Kothari VM , Karnad DR . Oropharyngeal cleansing with 0.2% chlorhexidine for prevention of nosocomial pneumonia in critically ill patients: an open-label randomized trial with 0.01% potassium permanganate as control . Chest . 2009 ; 135 ( 5 ): 1150 1156 . 2 . Koeman M , van der Ven AJ , Hak E , et al . Oral decontamination with chlorhexidine reduc...
متن کاملNeed to prioritise: end-of-life decision-making in India.
recent prospective, observational study compared 1,252 ICU patients who received oral care with 414 historical controls who did not receive oral care [4]. The incidence rate of VAP was significantly lower in the oral care group than in the non-oral care group. The recent study of KOEMAN et al. [5] reported the results of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with three arms: chlo...
متن کاملComparing the Effects of Orthodentol and Chlorhexidine Mouthwash on Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Patients of Intensive Care Unit: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Background and Aim: Ventilator-associated pneumonia is a common, serious and costly complication in patients of intensive care units. Oral hygiene is one of the important clinical measures to reduce the amount of pulmonary infection in these patients. Therefore, this study compares the effects of chlorhexidine and orthodontal mouthwashes on prevention of pulmonary infection in patients with end...
متن کاملEvaluation of the Effects of Oronasal Versus Oral Disinfections with Chlorhexidine on Clinical Criteria of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most prevalent and lethal form of nosocomial infections in the ICU and oral disinfection is a nursing measure to prevent this condition. Aim: this study aimed to evaluate the effect of oronasal versus oral disinfections with chlorhexidine on the clinical criteria for diagnosis of VAP. Method: This randomized clinical trial was conducted o...
متن کاملSelective digestive decontamination is superior to selective oropharyngeal decontamination
are interested in the debate on the effi cacy and safety of selective digestive decontamination (SDD) and selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) raised by Schultz and Haas in their review [1]. Th e authors concluded that 'SDD and SOD are equally eff ective with respect to the prevention of mortality' [1]. Th is statement is based on the results of a Dutch randomized controlled trial [2],...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Infection control and hospital epidemiology
دوره 29 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008